Seoul:Disputes over readiness standards and military capabilities are complicating Seoul's efforts to regain wartime operational control (Opcon) from the United States. The U.S. maintains that conditions necessary for validating the full operational capability (FOC) required for the transfer have not been met.

According to Yonhap News Agency, President Lee Jae Myung's administration aims to complete the assessment this year and set a target date for the transfer. However, disagreements between Seoul and Washington could hinder progress. General Xavier Brunson, commander of U.S. Forces Korea, emphasized that a premature transfer without adequate capabilities could undermine defensive readiness.

Complications have arisen as Washington reassessed certain capabilities previously deemed satisfactory, now finding them inadequate. This has led to complaints within the Korean military about shifting requirements. The U.S. insists that even previously satisfied requirements must undergo annual reassessment due to evolving battlefield conditions.

The U.S. is particularly focused on improving surveillance, reconnaissance assets, and command-and-control systems. Enhancements to data links and communication security are also demanded to ensure compatibility with Maven, an AI-based targeting system. The future Combined Forces Command, led by a Korean general, must also possess corresponding capabilities.

AI and advanced weapons systems are introducing new complications into Opcon negotiations. Concerns are growing that these difficulties may reflect an erosion of mutual trust between the allies.

While President Lee asserted confidence in a potential immediate transfer of Opcon, the Defense Ministry claims no fundamental disagreements exist. Yet, without completing FOC validation, confidence alone cannot accelerate the transfer. There is speculation that Seoul may delay the Security Consultative Meeting to gain more time to persuade Washington and seek a top-down agreement between the presidents.

Rather than pursuing a political settlement, the focus should be on resolving differences over evaluation standards and conditions for the transfer. Regaining wartime operational control is crucial for Korea's defense capabilities, but rushing the process could heighten public anxiety over national security.