Seoul: President Lee Jae Myung's nominee for minister of gender equality and family, Yong, has stirred controversy by choosing to retain her seat in the National Assembly while serving as a Cabinet minister, breaking from the traditional practice of resigning parliamentary positions for key government roles. Yong, who was elected twice through the proportional representation system, argues that retaining her seat is crucial for the survival of her minor party, the Basic Income Party, which holds only one seat in the Assembly.

According to Yonhap News Agency, Yong's decision to hold dual roles has sparked debate, with critics suggesting financial motivations might be influencing her choice. By maintaining her parliamentary status, the Basic Income Party continues to receive significant subsidies from the National Election Commission, approximately 1.1 billion won ($800,000) annually. If the party loses its parliamentary status, these funds would be withdrawn, potentially impacting both the party and Yong's household, as her husband works as a party official.

Yong's decision has attracted criticism from across the political spectrum. Lawmakers from both ruling and opposition parties have urged her to decide between her legislative seat and the ministerial post. Rep. Park Sun-won of the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) stated on a radio program that it would be fair for Yong to resign and allow the next politician on the waiting list to represent the public. Similarly, Jeon Yong-gi, another DPK lawmaker, suggested Yong should consider public sentiment regarding her choice.

The Justice Party, a progressive minor party, also called for President Lee to withdraw Yong's nomination, questioning the fairness of appointing a politician who gained a seat through proportional representation to a Cabinet position. Civic groups, including the Korea Women's Political Network, have expressed their opposition, criticizing Yong's legislative actions, particularly her support for the Criminal Procedure Amendment Act, which they argue could harm victims of sex crimes.

As the controversy unfolds, it highlights a broader issue of the ethical standards elected officials should uphold when personal interests clash with public duties. Many urge Yong to prioritize public interest and make a decisive choice.