Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission, June 14-“Weera” asked the NACC to examine “Ruang Krai”, a luxury car knot for almost 2 years, did not progress, did not believe his wife bought it for him. along with a pendant to open information about a luxury watch case "Gen. Prawit", according to the order of the Administrative Court, hurled the officers to hold the documents instead of logging into the system. reiterates distrust in the work of the NACC

Mr. Veera Somkid, chairman of the People's Anti-Corruption Network, submitted a letter demanding progress to the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) in case he had filed a complaint against Mr. Ruangkrai Leekitwattana for accepting a cashier's check. in the amount of 25 million baht on March 3, 2021, and in the case of a Facebook post stating that a kind adult bought a Mercedes S 560 on July 18, 2021, Mr. Veera said that it had been almost two years since he filed the accusation. this I have never been contacted by the NACC. to call to testify and provide information While Mr. Ruangkrai As the respondent, he was never called either.

Mr. Veera remarked that the documents submitted to the address were complete or not. Because someone once came to give information to him that he had filed a complaint with the NACC. But some important documents were not brought to the meeting of the NACC. therefore worried that their documents were lost or not Because some of the evidence submitted, Mr. Rueangkrai deleted from Facebook personally, which evidence is the message posted that “Received a gift from a kind adult, a luxury car”

“So today I filed a complaint asking the NACC to summon me to provide information and I will go in and check whether the said documents are still complete or not. If not complete I have made a copy which and if the document is missing The NACC must be held accountable. As for the case where Mr. Ruangkrai clarified that The kind adult who bought the luxury car for him was his wife. Mr. Veera said he didn't believe it because the post was ambiguous and gave an interview to the media in the in-depth program around Thai Inside Thailand. Why didn't you tell me directly, ”said Mr. Veera.

Mr. Veera mentioned the case of Mr. Ruangkrai. Submit an audit of Mr. Pita's ITV shares Lim Chareonrat far-reaching party leader Is there anyone behind the scenes that Mr. Ruangkrai belongs to the Palang Pracharat Party? often examines political parties that are polar opposites and never checked on other issues Therefore, it is definitely seen as a matter of politics. And today it is clear that there is a movement to block the government of the Progressive Party. and intercepted Mr. Phitha as Prime Minister ask the public to follow If this story ends, will there be other issues to intercept again or not? Please keep an eye on the day of voting to choose the prime minister and see if in conclusion the senator will raise his hand to Mr. Phitha or not.

Mr. Veera said that in addition to submitting a request for progress In the case of Mr. Ruangkrai also came to request The NACC complied with the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court, handing over documents item 1 and 3 in the watch case of Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan, even though the NACC resolved not to provide the document. But Mr. Veera saw that it was an unfavorable resolution because the NACC's resolution had a lower rank than the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court. Failure to comply is considered an offense.

The reporter reported that after the interview An officer came to request documents from Mr. Veera, but Mr. Veera noticed that the document the officer was holding was a copy of the letter that Mr. Veera complained about. Mr. Veera was therefore dissatisfied and criticized the behavior of holding the document openly. even though it is a book that has already received the number should be filed into the system not come to hold a revealing show like this Ready to ask who to bring the book to. which the officials clarified that they would be given to adults Mr. Veera then asked what the adult's name was. Because according to the procedure, you must take it to the director who accepts the matter. This made him uncomfortable. The NPA works like this. How can you trust yourself? insisted on not accepting this matter which the NACC secretary must have an answer.-Thai News Agency

Source: Thai News Agency