Constitutional Court 14 Jun-Constitutional Court Discuss the request for the status of "Sak Siam", order the relevant person to clarify more But did not specify who "person" refers to and by what time.

The Office of the Constitutional Court said that The Constitutional Court held a debate leading up to a decision in the case where the Speaker of the House of Representatives submitted the opinion of 54 opposition MPs at that time who asked the Constitutional Court to consider whether Mr. Saksayam Chidchob, Minister of Transport at that time Remains a partner and is still a shareholder and owner of Buri Charoen Construction Limited Partnership. This will cause Mr. Sak Siam to be involved in the management of shares or the affairs of the partnership, which is an act prohibited by Section 187 of the Constitution and the Ministerial Partnership and Share Management Act 2000, Section 4 (1). Mr. Sak Siam's termination according to section 170 paragraph one (5) of the Constitution or not?

In this regard, the Constitutional Court has ordered the request to be considered and ordered Mr. Sak Siam to stop performing as a minister from March 3, 2023 until the Constitutional Court has a decision. The Court was of the view that for the benefit of the consideration, the relevant person was requested to submit additional documents to the Constitutional Court. Who is the person and when and when to clarify.-Thai News Agency

Source: Thai News Agency