Seoul: The presidential office has decided against nominating one of the two Supreme Court justice candidates recommended by the chief justice, requesting a fresh recommendation from the head of the top court. This decision follows accusations from a presidential official that Supreme Court Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae had overstepped by not adhering to the customary practice of consulting the president prior to making recommendations.

According to Yonhap News Agency, Chief Justice Cho had, in August, recommended two sitting regional court judges for appointment as new Supreme Court justices by the president. Presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung cited a lack of "procedural completeness" in Cho's recommendation of one candidate, prompting Cheong Wa Dae to seek a new recommendation rather than forwarding the candidate to the National Assembly for approval. The other candidate's nomination will proceed to the National Assembly, having reached a general agreement.

Cho's method of submitting recommendations in writing, without prior personal consultations with the president, has sparked controversy. Critics suggest the traditional practice of prior consultations might unconstitutionally require the chief justice to seek approval for recommendations, potentially undermining the separation of powers. Kang emphasized that prior consultations aimed to prevent the Supreme Court from being shaped by unilateral intentions.

Kang criticized Cho for undermining judicial independence and defended the presidential office's request for a new recommendation as a measure to uphold the president's appointment rights. In response, Cho expressed regret for public concern and promised an official position announcement next week.

The opposition People Power Party (PPP) accused the ruling bloc of attempting to undermine the chief justice's authority and legal rights. PPP leader Rep. Jang Dong-hyeok argued that this authority is crucial for safeguarding judicial independence. Some PPP lawmakers suspect President Lee Jae Myung may intend to appoint favorable justices, anticipating potential trials post-presidency.