Parliament, Aug. 17 – "Nattacha" pointed out that "Srettha" should come and present his vision to the Prime Minister's meeting. Going far without discussing qualifications swipe, answer, knock, vote against, disagree - abstain Let's see the face of the new government clearly first. Saying that the discourse goes far, must vote for Pheu Thai Not turning off the switch. Senator. But it's the use of a mechanism to squeeze off the switch a step further.
Mr. Natcha Boonchai-Insawat, MP for Bangkok, the Kao Klai Party, gave an interview on the vision of Mr. Srettha Thavisin, the prime minister's candidate on August 22, saying that Candi Date Prime Minister is the person who will work for the people in the next 4 years, so what is the direction of the work? should have representatives of the people's brothers and sisters sent to serve in the House of Representatives to inquire In the past, the first Prime Minister's vote We have widely inquired whether Mr. Pita Lim Chareonrat far-reaching party leader What are the concepts, practices and how will the work as Prime Minister in the next 4 years be? Of course, this is the second Prime Minister vote. Whoever it is, it's the Pheu Thai Party. If you have friends, members of the House of Representatives Or a Senate friend will inquire in the House. can come to clarify The President of the Council has the power to invite relevant persons to speak by means of his throne.
When asked whether the Kao Klai Party was preparing to discuss the qualifications of the Prime Minister from the Pheu Thai Party or not, Mr. Natcha said that we had not inquired about his qualifications. In the past, there has been an election. through the people of the people People have decided From campaigning throughout the election period In terms of questions, various questions may not be possible, which Mr. Chaitawat Tulathon, secretary of the party has already presented to the press that at our party meeting There is an opinion that he will not vote to support Mr. Srettha. Due to the ambiguity in the formation of the government, which as of today, August 17, still does not see the face of the new government, what will it be?
When asked what day the Progressive Party will decide to abstain from voting or disagree, Mr. Natcha said that we are open to opportunities. Still unable to look at the face of the new government Still unable to see who the new government is We gave the opportunity until the last minute of August 21st. will announce the clarity or not In terms of abstaining or disagreeing, they will go to that day. But if you don't see any clarity must be disapproval mode
When asked whether Mr. Srettha was better than Gen. Prawit Wongsuwan, leader of the Palang Pracharat Party or not, Mr. Natcha said, of course, that we were campaigning for elections. In fact, the Pheu Thai Party and the Kao Klai Party There are many policies that are similar. but the wishes of the people after the election who wants the Pheu Thai Party and the Kao Klai Party to join hands in forming a government
“There is no way that we are going to support it. Candidate of Palang Pracharat Party or that the Prime Minister of the Palang Pracharat Party is better Because during the past campaign, we talked to the people that what we disagree What we see is different from the Palang Pracharat Party. And his prime ministerial candidate is General Prawit, what are the reasons we disagree with? We have already told the people. And the people have already decided, ”said Mr. Natcha.
When asked about the case where Mr. Rangsiman Rome, MP, party spokesman, will propose a motion for the council to review the motion that it can nominate the prime ministerial candidate again, will the same event occur on July 19? No, Mr. Natcha said, of course, the matter of Article 29, we bind by the council, there are problems by the council. Then the various external agencies that come to judge we also disagree because the legislature should use the council When the council binds the council, it must be solved, so we see that that day in the decision to vote After the resolution, there are academics University professors Concerned about the law that the council has passed While outside organizations express their opinions in a wrong way Therefore, we would like to bring up the stories that the council has tied up. and then resolved by the council by reviewing motions that have already been resolved
As for the process that you don't want to happen In reviewing this matter, Mr. Natcha said that it may be because if this matter has been revised, it has come to an opinion that it does not agree. and can come back and present again It may be feared that the Prime Minister candidate of the Progressive Party will vote again. Which this story is definitely trying to be a political game But the correctness must still remain with the council. The council should not do the wrong thing.
When asked what he expected to do with the Speaker of the National Assembly, Mr. Natcha said last time he had to respect the decision of the Speaker of the National Assembly. Which is the power of the regulations of the Speaker of the House of Representatives in Article 22, this time we would like to ask for sympathy that House of Representatives and the parliament itself that has a resolution Either way, it's binding. It's recorded in history as the performance of the House of Representatives. of representatives of the people's brothers and sisters doing the right thing or not. It records whether you did the right thing or not.
When asked how you look at it with people looking at it The Kao Klai Party did not vote for the Pheu Thai Party. Wrong with saying that it will help turn off the switch. Mr. Natcha said that he thought that the discourse said that he had to vote for Pheu Thai. To switch off that senator, it's not. Now the senator is using his mechanism to not vote for him. People's support is a consensus. Switching off the senators means that the senators are meaningless. in the Prime Minister's vote is the exercise of the right of the lower house only
“Now that we've spoken, 312 is a majority of the 500 in the House of Representatives. Therefore, in turning off the switch, Sat. Is to give the voice of MPs more powerful But now the senators have succeeded. To not vote for the candidate from the top party is squeezed by Said he would not vote for that party. and said that political parties should be afraid of MPs By going to vote and say This is the switch off of the MPs. I think this is not right, it is an indirect squeeze and it is more of a concerted switch off of the Progressive Party, ”said Mr. Natcha.
When asked to reiterate that it would not turn out to be for the Pheu Thai Party to shake hands with two legitimate uncles Because he can't campaign anymore, Mr. Natcha said that the most righteous is the handshake of 312 votes, which is the most righteous. and is the most demanding of the people's brothers and sisters And it's the best thing to do. by handshake 312 votes because it is a voice that comes from the brothers and sisters who want It is the side that the people's brothers and sisters want to administer the country.
“It cannot be denied that the needs of the people today Elected in a landslide, 312 voted for the side, but 312 voted could not form a government. Because there are other voices interfering, namely the voice of the senator and trying to pressure various opinions, trying to bounce back and forth, 312 voices split apart. Therefore, today he has succeeded, ”said Mr. Natcha.
“The first step is to hit 312 sounds apart. new audio integration It was up to the leading party at that time to decide. He will decide to handshake 312 solid votes and go for more votes if he can. As for him, he will decide not to shake hands 312 votes and go get the other side, he can do it. But it does not match the concept of the Progressive Party, ”said Mr. Natcha.
Mr. Natcha said that if there was a way to support Mr. Phitha as Prime Minister, the Progressive Party would do it. Because it is the mandate of the people. Today, 151 votes of the Progressive Party stand firm and want to fight for the needs of the people's brothers and sisters. But since we can't Because we don't have a voice to support, so it's proof to the people that elections are important. and the decision to choose a particular political party Or deciding to choose someone to act as our representative must be well observed.
“In this vote can meet your needs or not can come to serve in the council and vote for the prime minister on your behalf or not I want every political party today, people's brothers and sisters. together come out to pressure to make things normal in democracy is the picture that has the first voice to become Prime Minister We have to say this over and over again. because it caused abnormalities in society Someone tried to distort, someone tried to say that if the voices were combined, one side wins can be prime minister, ”said Mr. Natcha.-Thai News Agency
Source: Thai News Agency