UN Human Rights Council Divided Over China’s Xinjiang Policies
Members of the U.N. Human Rights Council are divided over China's hardline policies in its Xinjiang region, where more than one million Muslim Uighurs have been detained in reeducation camps that critics say are aimed at destroying indigenous culture and religious beliefs.
Observers say Beijing has successfully used its political and economic clout to impact the impartiality of the U.N. body, citing a recent letter from 37 ambassadors, mostly from Africa and the Middle East and including Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, and Russia, that positively evaluated the human rights developments in Xinjiang. The letter, addressed to the president of the Genevabased council and the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, proclaimed China's counterterrorism and deradicalization success in its western region of Xinjiang.
Days earlier, 22 mostly Western nations signed a similar letter to urge the world body to investigate China's human rights violations in Xinjiang.
If [people] continue to tolerate and connive China's infiltration into the UNHRC, people will have to be doubtful if the council can still truly remain impartial, said Dilxat Raxit, spokesman for the exile Germanyheadquartered World Uighur Congress (WUC).
The Friday statement by 37 ambassadors has not only divided the council, but also dashed the Uighurs' hope on the council to stand up against China in order for the justice to prevail, he added.
The signatories justify China's efforts by saying Faced with the grave challenge of terrorism and extremism, China has undertaken a series of counterterrorism and deradicalization measures in Xinjiang, including setting up vocational education and training centers.
China's Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang, on Monday, voiced appreciation to the ambassadors, saying that Xinjiang hasn't seen any terrorist attacks in the past three years and people there support the government's measures with a stronger sense of happiness, fulfillment and security, according to state media.
The 22 signatories from democratic countries including Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan and Britain expressed concern about credible reports of arbitrary detention in Xinjiang and widespread surveillance and restrictions particularly targeting Uighurs and other minorities.
They called on China to uphold its national laws and international commitments, including as a member of the Human Rights Council.
Aside from the geographic divergence between both letters, the proBeijing statement features many Muslimmajority states, which Raxit denounced as a lack of justice as they have turned a blind eye to Beijing's oppression of the Muslim population in Xinjiang.
China's economic lure?
Analysts say that economic power and potential benefits from China's One Belt One Road Initiatives aren't the only factors that countries weigh on when deciding to side with China or not.
For many, China's economic heft is a primary concern when deciding to rebuke Beijing so publicly. For other states, such as Russia, Saudi Arabia, and North Korea, their own human rights records at home have come under frequent attack abroad and so defending China becomes a roundabout way of defending themselves, Catherine Putz, managing director of a monthly magazine The Diplomat, wrote in a commentary.
Shih Chienyu, a Central Asian specialist from Chu Hai College in Hong Kong, argued that most of those Muslim states chose to side with Beijing for they've shared a similar history of being suppressed by western imperialist powers.
Source: Voice of America