Seoul: A special investigator involved in South Korea's second comprehensive special counsel probe has ignited a firestorm of controversy after sharing parts of a suspect's interrogation record and his appointment certificate on social media. This investigator, formerly a lawyer, remarked that gaining investigative experience would enhance his expertise in criminal cases and described the work as significantly more demanding than serving as defense counsel.

According to Yonhap News Agency, the incident has been criticized for not only demonstrating a lack of basic security awareness but also falling short of the professional standards expected from a legal practitioner. Typically, those working under a special counsel are not publicly identified, except for the independent counsel and assistant counsels leading the inquiry. This anonymity is intended to ensure impartiality and protect the integrity of the investigation.

In this instance, however, the investigator voluntarily disclosed his identity and shared portions of the investigative material. The special counsel team announced at a press briefing that a one-month pay reduction had been imposed as disciplinary action. Critics argue that this punishment is too lenient, given the severity of the breach, and have called for a thorough investigation and stronger measures, possibly including removal from investigative duties.

This is not the first instance of controversy surrounding the second comprehensive special counsel. Assistant counsel Kim Ji-mi faced criticism after appearing on a YouTube program and discussing the progress of an ongoing investigation, making remarks deemed inappropriate. Additionally, assistant counsel Kwon Young-bin was replaced after his previous legal work raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

These incidents underscore the need to reassess the qualifications and conduct of personnel involved in the probe. The recent social media post, in particular, suggests a focus on personal credential-building rather than fulfilling public duties. Ensuring strict internal screening to filter out unsuitable personnel is crucial, especially given the political sensitivity surrounding the investigation.

Repeated controversies threaten to undermine public trust in the probe's findings. Launched amid political disputes, the second comprehensive special counsel probe faces credibility challenges, and further missteps could exacerbate doubts. Investigators must prioritize professionalism and confidentiality to ensure the success of the inquiry and maintain confidence in the justice system.